Which States Will Legalize Online Poker Next?

Which States Will Legalize Online Poker Next?
2018 could be a busy year for online poker bills
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditmail

After New Jersey legalized and launched regulated online gambling in 2013, industry analysts thought more states would join the group that already included Nevada and Delaware. While they were correct that many states did consider online poker and gaming legislation, none of those states were able to push the bills over the finish line until late 2017 when Pennsylvania finally did it.

Online poker has proven more difficult an issue than most anticipated. Some states, like California, have considered online poker only, but even as a widely-recognized skill game, online poker was unable to find agreement among all parties in 10 years of consideration.

Most other states have put forth bills with online poker and casino games together, sometimes also paired with daily fantasy sports, because online poker has proven not to be a significant revenue generator on its own (ahem, Nevada). But New Jersey showed that a combined online gaming regime partnered with land-based casino properties was a winning match and has not only helped the entire gambling industry but also seen notable year-on-year growth since its launch. But putting online gaming in front of legislators raises many questions – some moral and others social – that complicate the issue and prevent much forward movement on legalization.

With that said, some lawmakers are absorbing facts and getting educated about the benefits of the industry, mostly courtesy of the stellar example that the New Jersey market has been. And with that in mind, there are some states that are on our watch list for passing 2018 online poker legislation.

Michigan

A state that was considered an underdog until about one year ago is now a top contender to legalize and regulate online poker and casino games in 2018. State Senator Mike Kowall spent time over the last two years garnering support for his bills but ran into conflicts with the state’s tribes. He has been working closely with them for several months to find compromise in order to move forward.

Meanwhile, State Representative Brandt Iden introduced HB.4926 in 2017 and quickly pushed it into a committee hearing in order to start discussions. His optimism has been refreshing, but he is likely running into the same problems as Kowall. His hopes for moving his bill this year are fading as the holidays approach, but he is very likely to continue to pursue his online gaming goals in early 2018.

New York

While on the list of serious possibilities for online gaming over the past few years, New York continues to run into problems with State Assemblyman J. Gary Pretlow. Though he has been a sponsor of bills in years past, he has also been the one to stop pursuing them in the latter months of each year due to issues that come to his attention. He has now expressed concerns about the land-based casinos that began operations this year, as their initial revenue numbers have been short of their projections. None of this bodes well for his support of online gambling.

State Senator John Bonacic has been a staunch supporter of online gambling and pushed his bills to passage in the Senate in 2016 and 2017. If he can find a different assemblyman to champion the issue in the other half of the legislature in 2018, there is a good chance that the state will come through. The brick-and-mortar casinos are already struggling to meet their goals, so they will likely help push for online gambling as a revenue booster.

Illinois

In a somewhat surprising move, Illinois had many believing it was close to legalizing online gaming in 2017. In May, the Illinois Senate voted on and passed S.208, a bill to legalize and regulate the games and daily fantasy sports by 42-10. The companion bill in the House, H.479, got stuck in a committee and scheduled hearings never materialized. The bill then came up during the October veto session for consideration but stalled there as well.

The good news is that H.479 is still open going into the next session that begins in January, which means no new bills need be introduced. Talks can continue behind the scenes through the next several months, and the committee can schedule a new hearing in early 2018. Since sponsor Representative Michael Zalewski has expressed optimism about the notion of a comprehensive gambling expansion bill to be put forth in 2018, this state will be one to watch closely.

New Hampshire

As New Hampshire finds success from its online lottery sales and watches neighboring New Jersey (and soon Pennsylvania) reap the revenue benefits from online gaming, it is likely to consider legislation again in 2018. Efforts began early in 2017 but never with the seriousness required to educate legislators. The three state representatives who sponsored H.562 this year have another opportunity for hearings and debate in 2018, if they push for debate and consideration early. While H.562 was voted inexpedient to legislate by a unanimous 23-0 vote in late October, this simply indicates that more information is needed in the coming months.

There is a good chance that New Hampshire strongly considers a new bill in 2018.

West Virginia

Several West Virginia delegates expressed support for online gambling in 2017. A group of them sponsored H.3067 in March of 2017 to authorize online gaming via partnerships with the state’s racetracks, but the bill failed to garner the necessary support to move forward. But Delegate Shaun Fluharty, the original sponsor of the legislation, pushed hard and even found support from the director of the West Virginia Lottery Commission. And after Pennsylvania passed its bill in October, Fluharty took to social media to express his desire to see his state follow suit.

While that did not happen this year, there is a high possibility that Fluharty will wrangle support over the winter legislative break and try again in early 2018. He wants to compete with neighboring states on the East Coast, and he understands well the benefits that await his state.

 

 

Related Articles