WSOP Main Event Biggest Bluffs: The 10 Most Memorable Hands Ever Pulled Off

The WSOP Main Event has produced more iconic bluffs than any other tournament in history. From Chris Moneymaker's audacious river shove against Sam Farha in 2003 to kickstart the Poker Boom to Nick Rigby's "Dirty Diaper" antics, these hands are why watching poker is so engaging. This breakdown covers the ten most memorable bluffs in Main Event history, with a street-by-street analysis of each hand so you can understand how they were pulled off.

Why Bluffing at the WSOP Main Event Is Different From Any Other Tournament

Many pros believe that the Main Event is one of the most psychologically demanding tournaments in poker. The 12-hour days, the marathon structure, and the pressure of shooting for poker’s biggest prize take a huge toll on even the most stoic professionals – creating unique opportunities for bluffing.

The $10,000 buy-in helps make the Main Event a special tournament. While there are hundreds of $10K+ events on the calendar these days, none of them come close to attracting the number of amateurs that the Main Event does. That entry fee represents a full year's poker bankroll for many players, which adds to the psychological pressure of each decision.

The amateur-heavy field of the Main Event creates unique table dynamics that are rarely found outside of the WSOP. World-class players can sit across from recreational players who have saved for years to have one shot at the Main Event. That mix produces unpredictable dynamics and hugely exploitable plays that you simply won't find at other high-roller events.

The visibility of the stage matters too. The Main Event is the pinnacle of poker and is watched by millions of fans around the world. With the WSOP’s new deal to bring the Main Event back to ESPN, that visibility is larger than ever. Playing on a TV table can affect a player’s propensity for bluffing, as some players go all-out to prove that they’re capable of sick plays to the watching public, and that awareness adds a layer of psychological complexity that simply doesn't exist anywhere else in poker. 

The 10 Biggest Bluffs in WSOP Main Event History

We’ve ranked these bluffs based on their audacity, strategic execution, and lasting cultural impact; the further down the list you go, the more iconic the bluff.

#10 — Andrew Wu Vs. Stephen Chidwick(2023 WSOP Main Event)

In this world of GTO robots, Andrew Wu showed that amateurs can still get one over on the pros.

Why It Worked: This hand is a great example of the weird dynamics that can happen in the WSOP. As an amateur on Day 5 of the Main Event, Wu isn’t perceived to be getting out of line, so when he shoves the river, Chidwick is put in a tough spot. Stephen’s hand is a bluff-catcher, so he has to decide how often he thinks Wu is bluffing in this spot. Given the circumstances of the hand, it seems unlikely that Wu would be bluffing much, if at all, so Chidwick eventually makes the fold.

It’s a classic “he knows that I know that he knows” situation, and this time, Wu came out on top.

Key Takeaway: Leverage your table image to your advantage. If you’ve been card dead and folding a lot, use your tight table image to open up and increase your bluffing frequency. You’ll find that players will overfold your aggression, making it easier for you to meet the required fold frequency for your bluff to be profitable.

#9 — Jamie Gold vs. Prahlad Friedman  (2006 WSOP Main Event)

Table talk was a feature of Jamie Gold’s run to the 2006 WSOP Main Event, and he shows off that skill in this hand against Prahalad Friedman.

Why It Worked: This hand was all about the table talk between the two players. When Prahalad checks back the turn, Gold knows that he likely has a weak pair, so applies the pressure with a big bet. When Prahalad is first considering his decision, Gold tries to act strong, talking as if he has top pair or better. However, when Prahalad starts figuring him out, he changes tact, almost verbally giving up on the hand before Friedman calls. The mind games ultimately work, and Prahalad goes against his better instincts to fold.

Key Takeaway: Always be “range-reading” your opponents. Prahalad’s check back on the turn signalled to Jamie that he had a weak hand, opening the door for him to pile on the aggression on the river. When you’re playing in your local game, look for spots where players check back a turn that should be better for their range, such as J85A, as it likely means that they’ve got a weak one pair hand and will fold to a large bet.

#8 — Adrian Attenborough vs. Matija Dobric  (2022 Main Event)

While playing from the BB is a disadvantage, there are opportunities to use the unique range construction to your advantage and pull off a big bluff like Attenborough does in this hand.

Why It Worked: Adrian understands that as the big blind, he has much more 3x in his range than Dobric, giving him more of a license to aggressively check/raise the flop. He also knows that Dobric will be betting this flop extremely often, so he expects this raise to work extremely often. When Dobric calls, his most likely hand is Kx, which he can apply pressure to with bets on the turn and river. The flush completing on the river gave Attenborough even more leverage, as it’s unlikely that Dobric would be calling with a flush draw.

Key Takeaway: Identify range advantage spots. Boards with two low cards, like K33, are generally better for the BB caller, as they’re more likely to have 3x hands in their range. Finding spots like these in your games requires you to be playing against the right opponent; a fish won’t fold a King in the same scenario, but a regular who thinks about the game will know that you’re repping a 3 or better, and will likely let it go.

#7 — Van Hoof vs. Larabe (2014 Main Event)

The pay jumps at the Main Event final table are massive, and provide the perfect opportunity for big stacks to leverage their advantage over their opponents, which is exactly what happened in this hand.

Why It Worked: The crux of this hand is Larabe’s donk on the turn and check on the river. When he leads out on the straight completing turn, he polarizes his range to essentially a queen or a bluff. However, when he checks the river, Van Hoof recognises that he wouldn’t do this with a queen, and takes the opportunity to make a huge bet and put maximum pressure on his opponent. With the original 9 players still battling it out on the final table, Larabe doesn’t want to cripple his stack by making a bad call, so he quickly folds his straight without much thought.

Key Takeaway: Think about what your opponent's bets mean. When you face an action from your opponent, consider what range of hands they’ll make that action with. In this hand, Larabe sizes down on the river after leading the turn, indicating that he’s got a good hand, but not the nuts. In most $1/$2 games, players will have a “bet size = hand strength” tendency, which means that the bigger they bet, the stronger their hand is. Look for spots where players are making weak bets and use your aggression to bully them off the pot.

#6 — Jordan Griff vs. Tamayo (2024 WSOP Main Event)

Heads up in the 2024 Main Event, Jonathan Tamayo flexed his poker skills by pulling off a huge bluff against amateur Jordan Griff.

Why It Worked: The hand plays out pretty standardly until the river; Tamayo raises and c-bets with a weak holding, and seems to give up on the hand until the river comes. The way that Griff quickly checked likely told Tamayo that he had a showdownable hand like one pair or two pair, and that a standard bet may not take it down. Plus, in heads-up, Griff is likely to 3bet a lot of his Ax preflop, giving Tamayo a clear range advantage on the river.

Tamayo leverages this advantage and makes a massive bet on the river, polarizing his range to a straight or nothing. Given the amount of Ax Tamayo has in his range, it’s hard for Griff to call with a hand like two pair, leading to his decision to fold.

Key Takeaway: Pay attention to timing. Griff’s quick check on the river signalled that he had a showdownable hand that’s happy to go check/check. If he had a value-betting hand, or was considering a bluff, he’d take more time to think about his decision. When your opponents make quick actions, they likely have an easy decision. For example, if your opponent raises preflop, then quickly checks on an A84 board, they likely have a pair between the ace and the 8, giving you the opportunity to win the pot by the river with continued aggression.

#5 — Karim Rebei vs. Brian Kim (2022 WSOP Main Event)

While Rebei is the player pulling off the bluff, most people remember this hand for the fold made by Brian Kim.

Why It Worked: This is one of the best examples of how the pressure of the Main Event can affect a player’s decision-making. The hand takes place on Day 7, with both Kim and Rebei having two of the biggest stacks in the tournament. In any other game, Kim would call the flop and would likely call the shove on the turn, but with the Main Event final table in sight, he took the conservative option and made a nitty fold.

Rebei could likely sense this conservative attitude from Kim and leveraged it into a well-executed bluff. 

Key Takeaway: Tell a consistent story. The reason that Kim was able to find a fold on the flop was because Rebei told a consistent story throughout the hand. His 5bet preflop and flop cbet, setting up a turn jam, was consistent with a strong hand like AA and KK, giving Kim the opportunity to fold a hand like QQ. When playing in your local games, we recommend using this strategy carefully, as not many players will have the discipline to fold a strong hand, even against convincing aggression. Avoid recreationals and target thinking players who are capable of folding.

#4 — Nick Rigby vs. Ronald Jensen (2021 WSOP Main Event)

With 60 players left in the Main Event, you wouldn’t think that anyone would be playing 32o in a 4bet pot, but Rigby showed that even the worst hands can come out on top if you’re brave enough to play them aggressively.

Why It Worked: Rigby correctly deduced that when Jensen checked the flop, he likely had a big pair, like KK, QQ, or JJ, and that a shove would put him under huge pressure with the ace on the flop. Whatever you think of the (frankly ludicrous) preflop play, he recognised a good spot for a bluff. We think that the speed of his shove does betray the strength of his hand, as a hand like AQ or AJ would likely think for a little bit before betting.

This hand is another great demonstration of the pressure of the Main Event. When the ace came on the flop, Jensen didn’t want to take the risk of busting with KK so close to the final table, so he made a quick fold without considering things like timing tells or bet sizing from Rigby.

Key Takeaway: Use scare cards to your advantage when ranges are narrow. 3betting and 4betting ranges in live games are extremely tight, so you can find spots for similar moves when your opponents check to you. By putting pressure on your opponents when they hold pairs worse than top pair, you’re giving yourself a great chance to get your bluff through.

#3 — Qui Nguyen vs. Gordon Vayo (2016 WSOP Main Event)

This heads-up battle was billed as a battle of styles: the aggressive Qui Nguyen vs the conservative Vayo. In this hand, Nguyen shows why aggression is so powerful.

Why It Worked: Doyle Brunson once said that the key to Texas Hold’em is to put a man to a decision for all his chips, and that’s exactly what Qui Nguyen does in this hand. While his triple barrel with J5 is almost certainly overbluffing, he’s leveraging the situation of being heads up for the Main Event title. From Vayo’s perspective, calling all in and being wrong would be an awful way to lose the heads-up battle, and if he thinks he’s the better player, he can wait for a better spot to try and trap Nguyen. However, Nguyen’s aggression won out in the end, and this hand played a big part in his Main Event win.

Key Takeaway: All-in bets are scary, and they work. This is particularly true of tournaments, where your tournament life is a consideration when calling an all-in bet. When you get to the latter stages of a tournament, look for spots like this where your opponents have wide ranges and can be bullied off their hand by the river. Late position scenarios, such as BTN vs BB, are perfect for this, as the BB caller will have a much wider range than usual.

#2 — Alejandro Lococo vs. Karim Rebei (2022 WSOP Main Event)

In the era of GTO, everyone thought that button clicking was a thing of the past – but it seems like no one told these guys!

Why It Worked: This hand is what many people call “old-school poker,” two players betting back and forth, convinced the other one has it; but is there any strategy behind it? Lococo holds the J♦, so he knows that it’s less likely for Rebei to hold JT, which would be the nuts on this board. However, after the turn 3bet, and especially the turn 5bet, most players would be convinced that Rebei had it, so we think that Lococo had some kind of physical tell that allowed him to pull the trigger on his shove.

Key Takeaway: Go with your gut. Intuition is essentially your unconscious competence; you know enough about the game to know, without thinking consciously, that your opponent’s story doesn’t make sense. In low-stakes games, players will regularly take weird lines that don’t make any sense, giving you an opportunity to bluff them off the pot. 

#1 — Chris Moneymaker vs. Sam Farha (2003 WSOP Main Event)

Arguably the most famous bluff in history, amateur Chris Moneymaker forced poker legend Sammy Farha off the best hand while battling for the Main Event title.

Why It Worked: Just like the first hand on this list, the success of Moneymaker’s play revolves around Farha’s perception of his bluffing frequency. Across from him is an amateur who’s heads up for the Main Event bracelet, the biggest prize in poker – how often is he going to be bluffing in a big spot like this? While the line of checking back the flop and raising the turn doesn’t make a lot of sense, it doesn’t have to, as Farha is unlikely to think that he’s bluffing in that spot.

Key Takeaway: Don’t be overawed by the situation. Bluffing is a key part of poker, and you can’t let the occasion of the hand scare you into making a passive play. Playing big pots can be scary, no matter your stake level, so we recommend that you work on self-soothing techniques to keep you calm while you play, like regulated breathing or positive imagery (just don’t make them too obvious!). Staying calm and composed gives you the confidence to make the right decision, no matter how daunting it can be.

What the Greatest WSOP Bluffs Teach Us About Bluff Construction

While they shouldn’t be your only form of study, looking back at these hands can teach you important lessons about bluffing. Below, we’ve highlighted the three patterns we see when analysing these Main Event bluffs:

1. Recognise Scare Cards – It’s important to know which cards are good to continue bluffing on, and which ones you should give up on. For example, in the Rigby hand, the board of A44 was perfect for bluffing, as Jensen likely had a big pocket pair and would be scared of the ace. That bluff wouldn’t have worked nearly as well if the board was 963.
   
2. Leverage The Situation – Using the tournament situation to your advantage is one of the best ways to get folds from your opponent. The Main Event is full of these high-leverage situations, whether it’s Qui Nguyen’s triple barrel bluff heads-up for the title, or Rebei’s 5bet/cbet combo late on Day 7 that forced Kim off his overpair. In the situations where the stakes are high, your opponents are far more likely to talk themselves into a fold than they are a call, so use that leverage to pull off your bluffs.

3. Use Your Table Image – In many situations, a player’s decision to call will come down to the frequency at which they think you’re bluffing. If you have a table image of a conservative player, you can use this to your advantage to get your opponent to fold. We saw this in the Wu vs. Chidwick hands and the Moneymaker vs. Farha hands – both pros thought that their amateur opponents would be underbluffing given the situation, which allowed their bluffs to work

Why Great Bluffs Define WSOP History

The biggest WSOP Main Event bluffs are remembered because they weren’t just reckless all-ins or Hollywood moments for the cameras. Each one combined timing, pressure, table image, and a deep understanding of how opponents think under stress. Whether it was Moneymaker changing poker history in 2003 or modern players finding creative ways to attack capped ranges and scared money, these hands prove that bluffing is still one of the most powerful weapons in tournament poker. While most players won’t find themselves battling for a world title under the bright lights of the WSOP, the lessons behind these bluffs still apply at every level of the game. Recognizing fear, understanding leverage, and telling a believable story are skills that can turn even weak holdings into winning hands.

Jordan Conroy

Author

View All Posts By Jordan Conroy

Jordan started writing about poker in late 2020 after discovering he could combine his passion for explaining things with his favorite game. He continues to stay on top of the newest poker theory and the latest goings on in the poker world to deliver top-quality content. While poker is his biggest passion, he also closely follows soccer, snooker, and F1.

WSOP Biggest Bluffs FAQ