SCOTUS Sports Betting Decision Reactions Pour In

SCOTUS Sports Betting Decision Reactions Pour In
Sports betting begins a new day in America

Now more than 24 hours since the United States Supreme Court ruled for New Jersey in the famous sports betting case, reactions are everywhere. Every facet of the gaming industry has responded, along with sports leagues, state governments, and even members of Congress.

The happiest of them all, however, is New Jersey. The Senate Majority Office and the Sports & Exposition Authority recently reported that the state received a bill for more than $8.7 million for work on the case. But the payoff was going to be worth it, as Oxford Economics estimated that a legal sports betting industry in New Jersey would generate more than $173 million in tax revenue and create more than 3,633 jobs.

Online Poker Industry Response

In the broadest sense, many in the gambling industry believe – or want to believe – that the SCOTUS ruling will have positive ramifications for online poker.

The Poker Players Alliance was one of the first to respond positively to the decision. Of course, the PPA has long been dedicated to poker and only more recently other forms of online gambling, but the nonprofit group also recently floated the idea of broadening its lobbying scope to add sports betting to its repertoire. With that in mind but no decision having been announced, the PPA issued a press release.

PPA President Rich Muny said, “This is a great decision for consumers who for years have had no alternative to wager on sports other than the black market. It presents states with the perfect opportunity to establish sensible policies not only to regulate sports wagering, but also other forms of gaming, including internet poker. Whether you are betting on sports or playing poker, lawmakers must make it a priority to protect customers. The states that have already regulated internet poker have proven that it can be done in a way the benefits consumers and governments. It makes sense for states that are eyeing sports betting to also realize the benefit of regulated iPoker and iGaming.”

Muny then added, “Today marks an important date for the future of gaming in the United States. The future of sports betting will continue to rely on internet and mobile technologies, and this is also true for all gaming. Now more than ever, states should take control of unregulated internet poker and sports betting and create systems that protect adult consumers and provide governments with new streams of revenue.”

Several well-known members of the poker community also chimed in, such as Phil Hellmuth:

And poker writer, businessman, and enthusiast Robbie Strazynski was excited:

iDEA (iDevelopment and Economic Assocation) founding member Jeff Ifrah was also quick to weigh in. Not only is his invested in the interactive online entertainment industry, his law firm submitted an amicus brief to SCOTUS regarding the case. He called the decision a jackpot for the entire gaming industry and went on to say, “Now entertainment companies formerly driven to offshore locations due to the strict limitations of the PASPA can return to the US, bringing jobs and economic opportunities with them. States like Illinois, Michigan and New York, which have been waiting for this opportunity, may now implement pro-business measures to encourage gaming and create the benefits like increased tax revenue that previously only a handful of states were permitted to enjoy. This ruling will create a positive domino effect by allowing any state that wants to, to open its doors and reap the benefits of rationally regulated gaming.”

Sports World Responds

Many athletes did not respond to the sports betting decision, but others in the industry were mostly positive in their takes.

Mark Cuban had quite a bit to say in support of the new industry as well, having long predicted that it was inevitable:

And of course, the losing party in the case, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), released a statement upon the announcement of the decision. NCAA Chief Legal Officer Donald Remy said, “Today the United States Supreme Court issued a clear decision that PASPA is unconstitutional, reversing the lower courts that held otherwise.  While we are still reviewing the decision to understand the overall implications to college sports, we will adjust sports wagering and championship policies to align with the direction from the court.”

Congress Weighs In

It only took a few hours from the time of the SCOTUS announcement for the first Congressman to speak up in opposition. Republican Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah revealed that he will introduce a bill to officially regulate all sports betting. “At stake here is the very integrity of sports,” he said. “That’s why I plan to introduce legislation in the coming weeks to help protect honesty and principle in the athletic arena.”

Hatch was one of the original authors of PASPA, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, that was overturned by the Supreme Court. He seems to understand that a ban is not feasible at this point, but the internet aspect of the new industry is what worries him. “We cannot allow this practice to proliferate amid uneven enforcement and a patchwork race to the regulatory bottom.”

Many industry experts believe, however, that a federal regulatory framework will not work; state-level regulation is already in progress and more preferable to most.


About Jennifer Newell

Jennifer began writing about poker while working at the World Poker Tour in the mid-2000s. Since then, her freelance writing career has taken her from Los Angeles to Las Vegas and back to her hometown of St. Louis, where she now lives with her two dogs. She continues to follow the poker world as she also launches a new subscription box company and finishes her first novel. Jennifer has written for numerous publications including and has followed the US poker and gaming market closely for the last 15 years. Follow Jen on Twitter

Disclaimer: The information on this site is my interpretation of the laws as made available online. It is in no way meant to serve as legal advice or instruction. We recommend that you seek legal advice from a licensed attorney for further or official guidance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles