legal-united-states-poker-sites
  • Online Poker
    • Poker Tournaments
    • Card Rooms
    • Poker Apps
    • Real Money Online Poker
    • Poker Games
      • Caribbean Stud
      • Mississippi Stud
      • Texas Hold'em
      • 5 Card Stud
      • 7 Card Stud
      • 5 Card Draw
      • 3 Card Poker
      • Omaha
      • Omaha Hi Lo
      • Horse Poker
  • Reviews
    • Americas Cardroom
    • Betonline
    • Black Chip Poker
    • Bovada
    • Ignition
    • Sportsbetting Poker
  • Deposit Methods
    • Bitcoin
    • Prepaid Visa
    • Visa
    • Cash App
    • Mastercard
  • Poker By State
    • Alabama
    • Alaska
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Indiana
    • Idaho
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Massachusetts
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Mississippi
    • Missouri
    • Montana
    • Nebraska
    • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • South Carolina
    • South Dakota
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Utah
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
    • Wyoming
  • World Series of Poker
    • Schedule
    • Main Event
    • Satellite
  • Poker Strategy
    • Bankroll Management
    • Betting Rules
    • Bluffing
    • Check Raising
    • Hand Rankings
  • Tournaments
Flag Background
Home › News › 2012 Lame Duck Session of US Congress Is Complete

2012 Lame Duck Session of US Congress Is Complete

Written by Cliff Spiller
Last updated on March 21st, 2025
Featured Image The 2012 lame duck session of the U.S. Congress has come to its formal close, and once again online poker players are left with little more than the status quo. Expectations were moderate to high for some sort of online poker legislation to come out of the session. Proponents pointed to the support of two powerful Senators from opposite ideological poles - Nevada's Harry Reid and Arizona's Jon Kyl - and the growing press from individual states such as Delaware as two factors that would push the bill over the top. Skeptics, however, noted stuff opposition from a variety of corners, the lack of time and proper vehicle for such legislation, asserting that concerns over the fiscal cliff would effectively suck all of the legislative oxygen out of the room. Ultimately it was the skeptics who won the day as the session concluded without any real evidence that Reid and Kyl were at any point close to marshalling the support necessary to get their bill passed into law. In fact, the bill was never actually formally introduced, a state of affairs that complicated matters for both supporters. Without any firm information about exactly what the bill contained, it was difficult to tout its merits or dispel misinformation from opponents. It's not clear what comes next for online poker at the federal level. Sen. Reid and fellow Nevada Senator Dean Heller have both publicly indicated their support for a federal solution regarding online poker regulation. But Reid's partner in the lame duck poker push, Jon Kyl, has now retired from the Senate. The chances of a poker bill advancing on its own seem as remote in the new Senate as they did in the old, although news that friend-of-poker Barney Frank may take John Kerry's soon to be vacant Senate seat would put at least one more advocate for regulation in the chamber. In the absence of action by the federal government, it seems likely that states will fill the void with legislation of their own. No fewer than a dozen U.S. states - including California, Iowa, Delaware, Nevada and Illinois - are at some stage of the process of regulating online gambling. Much of their progress to this point has been tempered by the uncertainty regarding the federal government's plans; after all, if online poker looked set to be regulated at the federal level, there would be little incentive for a state like Delaware to construct its own regulatory regime. With that question apparently settled - at least for now - we could see an unprecedented burst of regulatory activity at the state level. And as more states enter the picture, more and more still will be motivated to come along. Does that mean the federal government is completely out of the picture? Not necessarily. After all, Harry Reid remains a powerful force in the Senate, and his constituents by and large prefer a federal regulatory scheme. But with the lame duck come and gone, and the states moving forward the issue daily, Reid is certainly running low on time to pull a rabbit out of his legislative hat.

Comments

Leave a CommentCancel Reply
Placeholder Image Sign Up
Cliff Spiller

Online Poker Tools Reviewed

how to train for poker tournaments

How to Train for Poker Tournaments

ICM vs Chip EV on weighted scale

Differences Between ICM and Chip EV

See All
LUSPS Freerollers Open

‘Alexxa’ Wins LUSPS November Freerollers Open Final for $75 Top Prize

Draft Kings

How Will FanDuel and Draft Kings Withdrawal from Nevada Sportsbooks Impact Poker?

Jen Shahade at the NAPT

A Red-Letter Year For Women In Poker Continues At The NAPT Las Vegas

See All
Legal US poker sites logo
Browse Our Site
  • Poker Reviews
    • Ignition Review
    • Bovada Review
    • BetOnline Review
    • Americas Cardroom Review
  • State Laws
    • Texas
    • Florida
    • California
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • Ohio
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Colorado
  • New York
  • Arizona
  • Massachusetts
  • Wisconsin
  • Contact Us
  • Responsible Gambling
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Authors
  • Blogs
  • News
You Are In Safe Hands
Our Recommended Poker Sites Have Been Verified by
18+ BeGambleAware MGA
Follow us:

© 2024 Hyperdrive Promotions UAB | All Rights Reserved. Trust in Your Bets, Gamble Responsibly.
For Visitors 18 Years and Older.

Hyperdrive Promotions UAB
Level 27, Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central
Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
Tel:+1 (419) 601-6487