• Blogs
  • News
legal-united-states-poker-sites
  • Online Poker
    • Real Money Online Poker
    • Mobile Poker Sites
    • Poker Bonuses
      • No deposit
      • Rakeback
      • Reload
      • Loyalty Progams
      • Wagering Requirements
    • Networks
      • Chico
      • Horizon
      • Merge
      • Revolution
      • WPN
  • Reviews
    • Americas Cardroom
    • Betonline
    • Black Chip Poker
    • Bovada
    • Ignition
    • Sportsbetting Poker
  • Banking
    • Apple Pay
    • Bank Transfer
    • Bitcoin
    • Cash App
    • Crypto Currencies
    • Mastercard
    • Paypal
    • Prepaid Visa
    • Visa
    • Withdrawal Limits
    • Withdrawal Speed
  • By State
    • Alabama
    • Alaska
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Indiana
    • Idaho
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Massachusetts
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Mississippi
    • Missouri
    • Montana
    • Nebraska
    • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • South Carolina
    • South Dakota
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Utah
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
    • Wyoming
  • WSOP
    • Event Guide
    • Main Event
    • Odds
    • Past Winners
    • Rules
    • Satellite
    • Schedule
    • Top Women Players
    • Where to Watch
  • Games
    • How to Play
      • 3 Card Poker
      • 5 Card Draw
      • 5 Card Stud
      • 7 Card Stud
      • Badugi
      • Caribbean Stud
      • Horse Poker
      • Mississippi Stud
      • Omaha Hi Lo
      • Omaha
      • Razz Poker
      • Stud
      • Texas Hold'em
      • Video Poker
    • Where to Play
      • 3 Card Poker
      • 7 Card Stud
      • Omaha Hi Lo
      • Omaha
      • Texas Holdem
      • Video Poker
  • Strategy
    • 3 Bet
    • Bankroll Management
    • Betting Rules
    • Bluffing
    • Check Raising
    • Continuation Betting
    • Folding
    • Hand Rankings
    • Heads Up
    • Poker Positions
    • Positional Betting
    • Pot Control
    • Semi Bluffing
    • Spotting Bluffing
    • The Flop
    • Tight Aggressive
  • Tournaments
    • Freeroll
    • Multi Table
    • Progressive Knockout
    • Satellites
    • Sit and Go
    • Tournament Bonuses
    • Turbo
Flag Background
Home › News › Pennsylvania Lawmakers Begin Discussions on Legalizing Online Gambling

Pennsylvania Lawmakers Begin Discussions on Legalizing Online Gambling

Written by Cliff Spiller
Last updated on November 2nd, 2018
Featured Image

The Pennsylvania legislature is preparing to give legalized online gambling a serious look in 2015. Pennsylvania has had a complex history with gambling, while online gaming legislation went down to defeat as late as 2013. Still, the state is facing a budget crisis and gambling is often seen as an easier sell than higher taxes or a reduction in services.

This second online gaming bill has two major differences than the early bill which failed to gain support.

No Online Casinos Allowed

One, the latest bill clearly defines that poker is the online game that will be allowed online. Online casinos will not be allowed to operate in Pennsylvania, which is going to greatly reduce the revenues the state can collect from the Internet.

In other jurisdictions, online poker rooms have lagged behind the casino sites significantly, because they did not have enough players and liquidity to make the games attractive. Pennsylvania is a bigger state, so their lawmakers are assuming the population will be able to support a world-class iPoker experience.

Contains a Bad Actor Clause – No PokerStars

Two, the legislation contains a bad actor clause. A “bad actor” bans any company which accepted US players after the UIGEA went into effect in 2007. This bans PokerStars from participating in the Pennsylvania online poker industry. While these measures are decisive, the exclusion of PokerStars is one more limiting factor in the bill.

Tom Wolf Is against Online Gambling

Governor Tom Wolf could prove to be a stumbling block, but advocates of online gambling do not see him as a certain obstacle. While the current governor of the state is not a proponent of online gambling, he has promised to increase funding for public education and one painless way to do so without raising taxes is to license online casinos.

Pennsylvania has turned to brick-and-mortar gambling time and again when it needed more revenues. In 2004, the state’s leaders approved casino-style gambling at racetracks across the state. That began a program of expansion which continues to this day. Eventually, land-based casinos like the Sands Bethlehem were approved.

Land-Based Gaming Industry

By 2010, Pennsylvania had 13 casino operations on its soil. This expansion hurt Atlantic City, as Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers, and even some North Jersey residents preferred to go to the Philadelphia-area casinos than the Boardwalk.

In 2015, Pennsylvania is now the second-leading state in gaming revenues, behind only Nevada. That is remarkable, given the fact California has such a large casino gambling industry (though tribal casino revenues are not considered). The continual expansion of casino gambling in many ways has continued to make gambling normalized in the minds of the state’s residents, who seem to want more gambling.

Tina Davis Bill Defeated

Despite the land-based trends, the drive towards online gambling has been rebuffed in the state. In 2013, State Rep. Tina Davis penned House Bill 1235 to the Pennsylvania state legislature. Though Rep. Davis’s bill got lawmakers and citizens discussing the issue, HB 1235 never got any serious traction in the legislature. Only 11 representatives signed on to the bill.

Two years later, the environment might have changed. The budget concerns are greater. New leaders are in office. Online gambling is continuing apace in nearby New Jersey and Delaware, showing the possibilities. And the brick-and-mortar gaming industries are gaining more acceptance with the population.

In such an environment, it is hard for residents to reject one form of gambling, while embracing another. While some people try to make a distinction between online and offline gambling, most people do not seem to buy the argument.

The Governor Might Support It, Anyway

Several who claim to know Governor Tom Wolf, who just took office on January 20 of this year, say he is likely to see online gambling as an opportunity, if the measure is put before him. While the new governor has said he would find additional revenues by imposing higher income taxes on Pennsylvania’s well-to-do residents, it is though that the state will need additional sources of revenue to meet Wolf’s public education funding quota.

The fact Tom Wolf is a Democrat helps matters greatly. Land-based gaming executive and GOP donor Sheldon Adelson is seen as the single-biggest opponent of online gambling in the United States, because the billionaire president of the Las Vegas Sands Corp has sworn to spend whatever it takes to see online gambling banned in all 50 states. To that end, he has found Republican lawmakers to support his anti-online gambling legislation in the United States Congress. Sen. Lindsey Graham and Rep. Jason Chaffetz do the lion’s share of the world in both houses of Congress.

Las Vegas Sands’ Influence on the Outcome

Since the Las Vegas Sands Corp has a large presence in the state of Pennsylvania (The Sands Bethlehem), Adelson is better prepared to wield influence in Pennsylvania than most states outside Nevada. If a Republican governor were sitting, it might make it hard for that GOP executive to resist Adelson’s influence.

For a Democrat used to operating without Adelson’s fiat, the decision to sign a bill so dead-set against the gaming executive’s pet project would be easier.

Comments

Leave a CommentCancel Reply
Placeholder Image Sign Up
Poker player sits between contrasting visions of winning and losing, representing the psychological battle between rational decisions and emotional narratives.

Poker Psychology: The Stories Players Tell Themselves

Investigation board with corporate documents, cryptocurrency, maps and red string representing Crispin Rovere’s CoinPoker investigation.

Crispin Rovere’s CoinPoker Investigation Deepens

Lucas Jumalon celebrates after winning the 2026 WSOP Main Event, posing behind stacks of prize money while holding the championship bracelet.

Lucas Jumalon Wins the 2026 WSOP Main Event After Incredible Comeback

See All
Florida flag behind a judge’s gavel, poker chips, and smartphone representing the lawsuit against Global Poker owner VGW.

Florida Attorney General Sues Global Poker Owner VGW Over Sweepstakes Gambling

Poker chips, playing cards and gold decorations at a charity poker event.

Jamie Gold’s Variety Charity Poker Event Raises Over $250,000 In LA

Podcast microphone beside a poker table with cards and chips during a game.

Political Podcaster Tim Pool Says He Wins $100 An Hour Playing Poker

See All
Legal US poker sites logo
Browse Our Site
  • Poker Reviews
    • Ignition Review
    • Bovada Review
    • BetOnline Review
    • Americas Cardroom Review
  • State Laws
    • Texas
    • Florida
    • California
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • Ohio
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Colorado
  • New York
  • Arizona
  • Massachusetts
  • Wisconsin
  • Contact Us
  • Responsible Gambling
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Authors
  • Blogs
  • News
You Are In Safe Hands
Our Recommended Poker Sites Have Been Verified by
18+ BeGambleAware MGA
Follow us:

All Rights Reserved. Trust in Your Bets, Gamble Responsibly.
For Visitors 18 Years and Older.

Level 27, Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central
Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
Tel:+1 (419) 601-6487