• Blogs
  • News
legal-united-states-poker-sites
  • Online Poker
    • Real Money Online Poker
    • Mobile Poker Sites
    • Poker Bonuses
      • No deposit
      • Rakeback
      • Reload
      • Loyalty Progams
      • Wagering Requirements
    • Networks
      • Chico
      • Horizon
      • Merge
      • Revolution
      • WPN
  • Reviews
    • Americas Cardroom
    • Betonline
    • Black Chip Poker
    • Bovada
    • Ignition
    • Sportsbetting Poker
  • Banking
    • Apple Pay
    • Bank Transfer
    • Bitcoin
    • Cash App
    • Crypto Currencies
    • Mastercard
    • Paypal
    • Prepaid Visa
    • Visa
    • Withdrawal Limits
    • Withdrawal Speed
  • By State
    • Alabama
    • Alaska
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • California
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Indiana
    • Idaho
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Massachusetts
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Minnesota
    • Mississippi
    • Missouri
    • Montana
    • Nebraska
    • Nevada
    • New Hampshire
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • North Dakota
    • Ohio
    • Oklahoma
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
    • South Carolina
    • South Dakota
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Utah
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • West Virginia
    • Wisconsin
    • Wyoming
  • WSOP
    • Event Guide
    • Main Event
    • Odds
    • Past Winners
    • Rules
    • Satellite
    • Schedule
    • Top Women Players
    • Where to Watch
  • Games
    • How to Play
      • 3 Card Poker
      • 5 Card Draw
      • 5 Card Stud
      • 7 Card Stud
      • Badugi
      • Caribbean Stud
      • Horse Poker
      • Mississippi Stud
      • Omaha Hi Lo
      • Omaha
      • Razz Poker
      • Stud
      • Texas Hold'em
      • Video Poker
    • Where to Play
      • 3 Card Poker
      • 7 Card Stud
      • Omaha Hi Lo
      • Omaha
      • Texas Holdem
      • Video Poker
  • Strategy
    • 3 Bet
    • Bankroll Management
    • Betting Rules
    • Bluffing
    • Check Raising
    • Continuation Betting
    • Folding
    • Hand Rankings
    • Heads Up
    • Poker Positions
    • Positional Betting
    • Pot Control
    • Semi Bluffing
    • Spotting Bluffing
    • The Flop
    • Tight Aggressive
  • Tournaments
    • Freeroll
    • Multi Table
    • Progressive Knockout
    • Satellites
    • Sit and Go
    • Tournament Bonuses
    • Turbo
Flag Background
Home › News › Kentucky Refuses PokerStars Appeal, Flutter Eyes SCOTUS

Kentucky Refuses PokerStars Appeal, Flutter Eyes SCOTUS

Written by Jennifer Newell
Last updated on March 27th, 2021
Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear and Rep. Adam Koenig

The case of PokerStars versus the Commonwealth of Kentucky is over – really this time – at least on the state level. Most thought it was over in December 20 when the Supreme Court of Kentucky ruled against the online poker giant, but parent company Flutter Entertainment appealed once more.

This week, though, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled against another appeal. In the eyes of the state, it is over and done. And Kentucky now wants its money, which now includes interest and exceeds $1B.

PokerStars parent company Flutter Entertainment wants them to slow their roll.

The Original UIGEA Case

Most of the troubles regarding online poker in the United States reference Black Friday in 2011. That April 15 was the date that US government officials announced indictments against executives associated with poker sites, including PokerStars. The Department of Justice seized the sites and effectively stopped online poker in the US from the world’s largest companies.

Prior to that, however, Kentucky sued PokerStars not long after the US government signed the UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act) into law.

We wrote a more detailed explanation a few months ago. In summary, then-Governor Steve Beshear obtained a court order to block access to 141 gambling-related websites for Kentuckians. While many of those sites fought that action, the Commonwealth of Kentucky later sued a number of online poker sites (including PokerStars) for the rake they collected from 2006 to 2011.

As other poker sites folded (see what I did there?), PokerStars was the only viable company remaining for Kentucky to sue. The Franklin County Circuit Court ruled in favor of the state and ordered PokerStars to pay more than $870M plus interest.

PokerStars, then operating as Stars Interactive – appealed the ruling to the Kentucky Court of Appeals. In 2018, those judges ruled for PokerStars and dismissed the case.

The Commonwealth of Kentucky appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court, which handed down its decision in December 2020 in favor of the state. The 4-3 decision affirmed the trial court decision, reversing that of the Appeals Court. The new amount due to the state from PokerStars – with years of interest – was approximately $1.3B.

It Ain’t Over

The December ruling seemed final. Flutter Entertainment had acquired The Stars Group earlier in 2020 and didn’t plan to take that Kentucky Supreme Court ruling without a fight. Flutter claimed that PokerStars made only $18M in gross gaming revenue during those years in Kentucky, and Flutter planned to examine the “number of legal processes available.”

KY law may well permit a motion or procedure in its Trial Court on the amount of damages being reduced. But KY majority opinion appears to address that very aspect already and in detail on those $ issues raised on appeal.

— iji Law (@ijiLaw) December 17, 2020

Indeed, Flutter did submit a motion for rehearing on January 6, 2021. It only took the Commonwealth 20 days to respond in opposition to the rehearing. On March 25, the Kentucky Supreme Court denied unanimously to deny the motion to rehear the case.

On that same day of March 25, Flutter Entertainment on behalf of The Stars Group filed a motion to stay any enforcement of the Kentucky Supreme Court judgment pending a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). The court must respond by April 7.

That option became clearer with the Flutter statement in response to the ruling against the rehearing.

“Flutter is disappointed by the denial of its rehearing petition and continues to strongly dispute the basis of this judgment. Together with its legal advisors, Flutter will continue to consider its position in relation to the judgment, including potentially appealing the ruling of the case to the US Supreme Court along with other legal avenues which it may pursue thereafter.

“Flutter remains confident that any amount ultimately paid to resolve this matter will be a limited portion of the reinstated judgment.”

It seems that the motion with the Kentucky Supreme Court simply keeps the window open for a SCOTUS appeal. It provides time for Flutter’s attorneys to examine the company’s options.

Flutter…

Update on Kentucky legal proceedings pic.twitter.com/N0h2M7P1TW

— Alfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽 (@astraffon) March 26, 2021

Kentucky Wants the Money

The Commonwealth of Kentucky clearly doesn’t plan to wait around for Flutter to act.

Governor Andy Beshear, son of Governor Steve Beshear who started the whole process in 2008, told the Associated Press that Kentucky will pursue the $1.3B. Lawyers filed a motion in the Franklin Circuit Court – the original court – to collect $100M in bonds. Evidently, PokerStars originally posted $100M in bonds five years ago after the initial court loss, and Kentucky is prepared to collect.

A hearing on that matter is set for April 19.

Meanwhile, Beshear continues to misrepresent PokerStars by calling it an “illegal internet gambling criminal syndicate.”

 

Comments

Leave a CommentCancel Reply
Placeholder Image Sign Up
Investigation board with corporate documents, cryptocurrency, maps and red string representing Crispin Rovere’s CoinPoker investigation.

Crispin Rovere’s CoinPoker Investigation Deepens

Lucas Jumalon celebrates after winning the 2026 WSOP Main Event, posing behind stacks of prize money while holding the championship bracelet.

Lucas Jumalon Wins the 2026 WSOP Main Event After Incredible Comeback

Magnifying glass over poker chips and a laptop displaying an online poker table, representing an investigation into offshore poker platforms and player trust.

Poker Room Review’s CoinPoker Investigation Explained

See All
EPT Barcelona 2026 poker tournament table with chips and trophy

EPT Barcelona 2026 Underway Ahead of Main Event

Lucas Jumalon celebrates after winning the 2026 WSOP Main Event, posing behind stacks of prize money while holding the championship bracelet.

Which Player Lost Half Their WSOP Main Event Winnings to Tax?

Two poker tournament winners pose with a championship belt behind a large stack of cash and poker chips at the final table.

Lucas Jumalon Wins 2026 WSOP Main Event for $10 Million

See All
Legal US poker sites logo
Browse Our Site
  • Poker Reviews
    • Ignition Review
    • Bovada Review
    • BetOnline Review
    • Americas Cardroom Review
  • State Laws
    • Texas
    • Florida
    • California
    • Virginia
    • Washington
    • Ohio
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Colorado
  • New York
  • Arizona
  • Massachusetts
  • Wisconsin
  • Contact Us
  • Responsible Gambling
  • About Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • Authors
  • Blogs
  • News
You Are In Safe Hands
Our Recommended Poker Sites Have Been Verified by
18+ BeGambleAware MGA
Follow us:

All Rights Reserved. Trust in Your Bets, Gamble Responsibly.
For Visitors 18 Years and Older.

Level 27, Wing On Centre, 111 Connaught Road Central
Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
Tel:+1 (419) 601-6487